Just wait until she flashes on the right: Tino Chrupalla looks at Sahra Wagenknecht before the broadcast
Photo: dpa
You can think of what you want from television: it is still the best test for politicians whether they can convince. There are as many TV duels than ever before. As if the television, less and less, and the politicians, who believe less and less, had allied to be perceived. Okay, let’s do it. We look there, then you don’t have to do it, dear readers.
On Thursday evening there were the parties on ZDF, who are not there next Sunday at “Das Duell – Scholz against Merz”. Her top officials, except for Sahra Wagenknecht (BSW) everything men, stood in transparent plexiglastic and could be asked well by the sovereign moderator Andreas Wunn without endless. They know the brevity of the attention span of the viewers better than those from the political generation in front of them and also seem to be better briefed. Jan van Aken (left), Tino Chrupalla (AfD) and Alexander Dobrindt (CSU) murmured into comments in the explanations of the others, but never strong enough to tear the word itself (as Gerhard Schröder or Jürgen Trittin would have wanted).
Van Aken acted the most emotional when he regrown Chrupalla: »Now keep your right edge, I’m just talking. Sorry. ”Moderator Wunn asked Chrupalla if he got upset about it? The replied: “No, why should I get upset about it? It is election advertising for us. ”The AfD from the BSW and Chrupalla did not even get direct support in the embarrassment of defending racism in the” topic of migration “with its simple formulation. This was done by the usual eloquent and pedagogically occurring Wagenknecht, who flared “loss of control” and “political failure” in order to say that migrants would take the cheap apartments away. Then she was very sure. Dobrindt nodded in agreement and expressed the intersection of the BSW and CSU a little more statesmen: “We have to reorganize the migration topic.”
Wagenknecht was only unsure whether she should do her former comrade van Aken as much as he should? No mercy with the refugees is the new course that only van aken vehemently contradicted (and – with drawbacks – Felix Banaszak from the Greens). Van Aken considers this to be a “diversion debate” of the fact that “this country has been broken”: “We have to go to the prices, both in the supermarket, but especially in rents.” Christian Lindner (FDP) also has A thesis: “The AfD is not made small with fairy lights”. Banaszak reacted immediately: “The AfD is not made small by taking over the stories and narratives that this party has been driving through the country for years.” For the first time there was applause from the audience.
What typology remains in the memory? Lindner: Self -in -loving teacher, who is the only one who illuminates the importance of his gentle flow of speech, the others unfortunately do not understand it. Most important sentence: “Germany is not attractive to the talents.” Wagenknecht: Bright lamp that flashes on the right because she wants to turn there. Most important sentence: »So. Can I say something about the topic? ” Van Aken: Intelligent emotional leftist, hard but warm. The most important sentence: “If there is an overwhelming, this can be solved with money.” Banaszak: Friendly school spokesman, reflected and controlled. The most important sentence: “You should like to go to schools and daycare centers again.” KRPRUPALLA: Rather showmen than actors, is waiting for even more audiences. Most important sentence: “The CDU/CSU now demands that.” Dobrindt: Celebrate Kellner, very self -righteous. Most important sentence: “The order is currently not guaranteed.”
Read on Tuesday: The duel between the number and not a chancellor
link sbobet sbobet sbobet88 sbobet88