RAF – Post to Daniela Klette: A stolen letter

In his work “The postcard – from Socrates to Freud and beyond”, Jacques Derrida writes when something “never arrives at the place of chic, that’s for the oven”. For the oven, my letter dated April 24, 2025 should be on the Daniela Klette in the JVA Vechta, which is currently on trial due to various illegal money procurement measures. In any case, when it comes to the will of the Federal Attorney General, who, by letter dated May 13, 2025, applied for the handover of my letter to the investigative judge of the Federal Court of Justice after “gross review”.

The Federal Prosecutor’s Office is considering another lawsuit against Daniela Klette because of its suspected participation in three attacks by the Red Army Group (RAF) and has sovereignty over Velcro imprisonment, although the district court in Verden, which is responsible for the ongoing process, is not tired to assert that the process has nothing to do with the RAF. It is the federal prosecutor who did not seek contact with those who had declared this dissolution after the dissolution of the RAF in 1998 to try to cope with an enlightening discourse with both sides. Instead, she continued to focus on intensive searches and thus forced those living in illegality to obtain funds differently than through the sale of their workforce, which means that they – according to Marxian “capital” – made of free in slaves, from goods owners into goods.

I wrote the letter that Daniela Klette should not be handed over immediately after my last visit to the JVA Vechta, which was monitored by three BKA officials and a JVA employee. Daniela Klette opened our conversation with the note that she read my meeting of the book “Forest of Noise” by the Palestinian poet Abu Toha in the daily “Junge Welt”. She denied my question whether she also read my review of the anthology “Beirut” (Wieser Verlag), which was published approximately at the same time in the “ND”. I promised to send her by letter.

After discussing the situation in the Middle East, we came up with the bellicist talk of military and manifold as well as the celebrations for the anniversary of the exemption from fascism and also on the Russian hatred. I mentioned that it was a passage in my text »C. (Work in Progress) «, which had been published in the» New Berlin Illustrated Newspaper «, and which I would also send her by letter. In the letter I explained: “› In Progress ‹thinks that it is to be a longer text that is planned as a quasi-autobiographical text, but exits in all directions.”

In my letter, the administrative Federal Prosecutor’s Banausie did not recognize any “individual communication content”. The reasons for detention would be contradicted by having to be controlled reliably because it cannot be controlled reliably in the request of the Federal Attorney General Marcel Croissant. How individually do texts have to be so that the Lord recognizes the individual? And perceives that an autobiography is in the identity between the writer’s self, narrator and protagonist? In addition: Daniela Klette may move into the “ND” via the institution, but not a text that an author of that daily newspaper sent it personally and almost in the original typography by letter.

The General Walt knows that there is a letter near distance. But this shouldn’t be. The ban on handing over is not against me, the sender, but against Daniela Klette, who is to be impossible for any continued political argument. À Propos Communication: Unlike the prisoners from the RAF in Stammheim once once, she does not even have a functioning typewriter and punch paper to communicate with her lawyers in writing, a fact that the litigation in the process in the process of weapons, which is continued on May 28, will be continued in a specially converted riding hall in Verden-Etze. Tied up on hands and feet and complained with a lead vest that leads to headache and difficulties of concentration with her, Daniela Klette will again be driven to the negotiating location under a high level of security.