RAF – Daniela Klette in the JVA Vechta: Please no Bimmelbahn

On May 27, 2025, my text “A stalled letter” was published in the “ND”. I described that a letter to Daniela Klette, who sits in Vechta in the correctional facility for women, should not be handed over to the prisoners on the grounds that it does not contain any “individual communication”. In this letter there was, among other things, an extract from an autobiographical, i.e. highly individual writer’s work by me, which was published in the “New Berlin Illustrated Zeitung”.

Daniela Klette reacted to my »ND« text. Her three -page letter, a typewriter written on May 31, 2025, arrived on June 18 (postmark: »170625«). The official U-liability auditor seems to be an extremely slow reader. In this letter, Daniela Klette describes that her sister wanted to send her an article about the conversion of a Bimmelbahn near Karlsruhe, about whom the Karlsruhe sisters had spoken to one of her phone calls every 14 days. In turn, the article was not allowed to be sent to the JVA due to the lack of “individual communication”.

Daniela Klette, on the other hand, wanted to send her sister two articles from the newspapers approved and handed over. One of these articles was about street dogs in Istanbul and Athens who run in demonstrations. The second newspaper text acted by rats that are trained to detect land mines. Such rats are used in Cambodia, for example. These articles, which were also the subject of the telephone calls between the two sisters, were not allowed to leave the JVA Vechta.

On the Internet, I read in a lawyer presentation that letters that are also about the allegation are always confiscated as evidence. Likewise, letters can be stopped with content that can endanger the order of the prison or the detention center. What a Karlsruhe Bimmelbahn, newspaper article about pigeons and rats have to do with the allegation of the crime or how they should endanger the institutional order or the appeal, remains the secret of those who prevent communication between the prisoners and their sister, such as the explanation, as with this censorship measure an escape, evidence or repetition (paragraph 119 of the Code of Criminal Procedure: Basic restrictions on detention during pre -trial detention, paragraph 1).

Just that day when my text appeared “a stolen letter” in the “ND”, I found a summons for interrogation by the Federal Criminal Police Office in the mailbox. The interrogation was scheduled for June 20, 2025. The summons contained a file number and the note that I should be heard in an investigation into murder. After my lawyer pointed out the BKA that the interrogation had to be specified, I received a second summons by pointing out that it was an investigation against Daniela Klette. The BKA did not want to answer my question of whether I should be heard as a journalist.

I am not the only one who has received a summons from the BKA. So far, a number of people who are in a letter to Daniela Klette or stood or made visiting applications have been invited to help the BKA to be expanded to know. If you cannot or do not want to provide usable statements, you will be suspected and suspended threats of prison. The Federal Prosecutor’s office apparently does not progress in its investigations due to the alleged participation of the crime of Daniela Klette in actions by the Red Army Group and simulates bustle with the lectures, which does not control by any rule of law.

On June 12th, I sent the BKA a certificate from my family doctor in which he referred and wrote to my coronary three vessel disease that I should avoid any further psychosocial burden until further notice, as this leads to an increased risk of heart attack. The BKA was completely unimpressed and invited me to interrogate again on June 20. This is scheduled for July 22, 2025.

In the Mail of the BKA Commissioner it says: »I ask for understanding that only an official and no private doctor test is accepted to believe that an inability to be disabled. If the symptoms stop, a corresponding certificate is required. The witness load is based on a public prosecutor’s order on the part of the Federal Attorney General at the Federal Court of Justice (GBA). As a result, I have to point out the consequences of an unauthorized absence or the unjustified refusal of the interrogation. In this case, the public prosecutor decides on the imposition of measures (order money, compulsory demonstration and orderly) and the imposition of the costs caused by the absence or the consumption of testimony in accordance with Sections51 and 70 StPO. «

The BKA threatens to discretion, and what is dismissed as “complaints” is a chronic disease, whereby phases of different lengths can change with low symptoms with unstable and questionable phases. It is therefore also referred to as chronic coronary syndrome.

The Federal Prosecutor and BKA, with disregarding Article 2, Paragraph 2 of the Basic Law (“Everyone has the right to life and physical integrity”), apparently accepts the risk of a heart attack, i.e. a concrete life or serious health risk. The BKA deliberately ignored the hint of my family doctor that an extended specialist cardiological clarification is necessary. It cannot be replaced by an official medical assessment.

The prosecutor and the judge at the court will certainly continue to speak of an “objective” procedure against Daniela Klette. The process for various money procurement offenses takes place in a specially converted riding stable. This monster, according to the judge, was created by a pure administrative decision, is separated from a children’s playground by NATO wire. It is objective if the Federal Prosecutor’s Office and BKA specify what to happen in the criminal case. Against this file of the political judiciary, which has been arrested in the switch and act of the 1970s and cannot cope with that Daniela Klette could avoid access for several decades, should the bells of the medially recognized Karlsruhe Bimmelbahn sound loud and heard until this absurd spook comes to an end.