Ezzes by Estis – toches

And what will come in the end?

What comes in the end has no end. On the one hand, that sounds very philosophical, but on the other hand it is of course also because it is about the end, and when it comes to the end, everyone becomes philosophical. Nevertheless, philosophy also ends and philology and psychology and phantasmagorie, and they all go into the Schmonzes, which was already at the beginning and will be at the end and even beyond, because the Schmonzes is infinite.

But what comes to the end of Schmonzes when the philosophy ends? In the end there is something that is not philosophical at all. In the end there is something everyone has. Why? Because everything has to end, so in the end something has to come that everyone has.

I tell you one Majßea little story. Do you know my nephew Motja? If not, it doesn’t matter because you definitely have a nephew Motja yourself. And if you don’t have a nephew Motja, it doesn’t matter because you may have a grandson Jascha or an uncle arik or because you may be a nephew Motja, which is going out on the same, at least almost, and “almost” almost “completely”.

Do you know what happened to Motja? A lot happened with Motja. With Motja, for example, it happened that he sailed around for days and nothing happened.

Nephew Motja, the daylight, the Pussy PassnikSo sitting on his toch all day, as firm as the lard on the bread, as long as a star in the firmament, as heavy as a rock on the desert base, as unchangeable as the law in the script. How which law? Like any law, but for example, like that, that everything ends and that in the end the toch always comes. And nephew Motja was just as unchanged on his toch all day – so unchangeable that it would not have done the slightest if he hadn’t been a nephew Motja, but grandson Jascha or uncle arik or even both.

The fact that nephew Motja was sucking around on his toch was of course better than if he had not sat on his toch, but on his shoulders, for example, or his temples – or even more on a foreign toch. But it was also significantly worse than if he hadn’t lived around, neither on his toches nor on anything else, and instead had done something.

Ezzes von was

Magnus Terhorst

Alexander Estis, a freelance Jew without a permanent residence, writes so much Schmonzes in this column that the pejes grow.

“Motja, do something!”

“But I’m doing something, and not just that, I’m even doing something!”

“Beded, okay, but what are you doing?”

“Don’t you see? I’m sitting on my toch! “

So by doing it, he did nothing, but if he had done something, he should have stopped doing it.

Yes, it would have been really better if Motja had not laid around on the toch, but had followed an activity. But Motja should have got up from his toch, which neither this one wanted nor that. Why not that either? Because the determination of a toch is that you sit on it, which is why the toch did justice to its destination, in contrast to Motja, the determination of which it would have been to pursue an activity.

So while Motja was sitting on his toch, his destination passed him. In fact, it is a further determination of the toch that something is going on or even everything; And this determination of the toch was also met thanks to Motja. That is almost everything that happened to Motja, namely nothing.

Because it is a law that everything has to end, but not that everything has a reasonable end and a beautiful and a round. So what’s in the end? Something everyone has, the toches. Why? Because everything passes him.